My supervisor Jesper Schneider asked me “What does social mean?” the other day. Thats actually a very good question. So here I list some definitions, while I ponder my definition of social.
Wikipedia has many more or less helpfull definitions. In the introduction there’s a rather good sentence
“…its meaning is at times vague, suggesting that it is a fuzzy concept.”
Another is that social means Interactions between people (social interaction)
The German Wikipedia has a better definition
“In der Umgangssprache bedeutet „sozial“ den Bezug einer Person auf eine oder mehrere andere Personen”
[In colloquial language social means the reference of a person to one or more other persons] Translated by me
Oxford English Dictionary says social is the
“Capable of being associated or united to others”
“United by some common tie”
Oxford Dictionary of Sports Science & Medicine in Medicine [requires login]:
“Pertaining to the interaction humans have with one another, either as individuals or in groups.”
Good old Merriam Webster dictionary:
“…of or relating to human society, the interaction of the individual and the group…”
It seems like the term social only mostly is defined by the a jointing term. Social interaction is clearly described in many dictionaries while social tends to lack proper definition.
So what is social in the context of my research?
Social tagging: is a term often used for user generated metadata, the action where a user index an information object. What so social about the actual indexing (tagging)? I truly believe the result of the tagging, the folksonomy is some sort of manifestation of a social nature, but the process of tagging is an individual action. Maybe the folksonomy can be regarded as a social organization (thank you Jesper for the definition).
I don’t think I come any closer to a definition right now - But the quest continues.








April 25th, 2008 - 4:22 pm
I think the actual tagging can be thought of as both individual and social, the defining of a tag that is…. Some groups on Flickr require a certain tag to be given to all photos posted in the group pool.
I have also found that users copy each others tags, both on Flickr and delicious. I don’t know if my definition of “individual” is to rigid, but both of these ways to tag are somewhat social if you ask me.
Am I making sense? Or is it brainfudge?
April 29th, 2008 - 10:07 am
Not brain fudge at all.
So the actual tagging process can be seen as both; social, the ones you described so good and individual, for the users personal information management.
July 27th, 2010 - 7:48 am
JVC Everio…
My blog about JVC Everio…
August 12th, 2010 - 3:57 am
distinct insurance…
My blog about distinct insurance…